Key highlights
- Tesla compared 160 million kilometres with FSD Supervised against 2.4 billion kilometres of manual driving with active safety features enabled.
- Automatic emergency braking activations were 66 per cent lower with FSD engaged, according to Tesla’s data.
- FSD remains a supervised driver-assistance system, with the driver responsible for monitoring the road and taking control when required.
Tesla has marked the first anniversary of Full Self-Driving Supervised landing in Australia by publishing its own safety numbers, and the headline figure is a 40 per cent reduction in collisions for cars using the system compared with the same vehicles under manual control.
It’s worth being upfront about what that means. FSD Supervised is not a hands-off, eyes-off system. Despite the name, it still requires an attentive driver ready to take over at any moment. Tesla is comparing crash rates within its own fleet, between FSD-engaged driving and everything else, rather than against other brands or systems on the market.
Alongside the headline crash figure, Tesla says it recorded drops of between 66 and 90 per cent across a handful of other metrics when FSD was active; Automatic Emergency Braking activations, harsh braking, harsh acceleration, harsh lateral acceleration, and even horn usage.
Read more: Tesla Cybercab coming to Australia soon for display only
The scale of the data, and its limits
To back the numbers up, Tesla says Australian and New Zealand owners have racked up 160 million kilometres with FSD switched on over the past 12 months, against 2.4 billion kilometres driven without it. That’s a big gap, and it’s a fair question whether 160 million kilometres is enough distance to draw firm conclusions from, especially when FSD use likely skews toward certain types of driving, such as highway commutes, rather than a random cross-section of every trip Tesla owners take.
Tesla has published its methodology online, which is a good sign for transparency. One detail worth flagging for anyone trying to make sense of the numbers. The company counts a crash as an “FSD Supervised” event if the system was active at any point in the five seconds before the collision. That’s a reasonably generous window, and it means some crashes attributed to FSD could involve a driver who had only just taken back control, or who was about to.
None of that means the claims are wrong. It just means, as with any safety data a manufacturer publishes about its own product, it’s worth reading the numbers as a company’s best case rather than an independent verdict.
Why does this matter for Australian buyers?
FSD has become a genuine part of the Tesla ownership pitch here, and Australia has been buying into Tesla in a big way. The brand has been the best-selling vehicle in the country outright in May, June and August this year, not just among EVs, so any safety data tied to its most talked-about feature is going to get attention from a lot of current and prospective owners.
Access to FSD in Australia currently sits at $149 a month for those who haven’t already locked in the old outright purchase price, which was last set at $10,100. Tesla has moved to a subscription-only model for anyone yet to buy in, so if you’re weighing up whether the ongoing cost is worth it, this is the first real safety data set Tesla has given local owners to make that call.
The bigger picture
Globally, Tesla says close to 1.5 million vehicles, or about one in seven ever built, are now running FSD Supervised, up 56 per cent on this time last year. Close to half of those users are on the subscription plan, which by Tesla’s own estimate is generating around AUD$1.2 billion a year in revenue worldwide.
That growth trajectory tells its own story. FSD is no longer a niche extra for early adopters, it is becoming a meaningful part of how Tesla makes money and how it wants to be seen as a safety leader. Whether Australian regulators or independent bodies weigh in with their own analysis of this data remains to be seen, and this article will be updated if that happens.
For now, the numbers are Tesla’s own, and Australian drivers considering the subscription should treat them as one data point in a bigger decision, not the final word on how safe the system actually is on local roads.
Comments
New Comment